Law Office of James M. Stanley
Call Us Today(817) 591-4222
Se Habla Español
  • Home
  • Attorneys
  • Firm Overview
  • Personal Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Blog
  • Case Results
  • Contact Us
  • Our office
  • In memory of Christi Stanley
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
  • We Take the Time To Understand Your Story

    Why Hire Us
  • We Tailor Our Solutions to Fit Your Needs

    Free Consultation
  • We Stand at Your Side from Start to Finish

    View Our Results
Blogs 2021 February Proving a Defective Product Claim: What You Need to Know
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Proving a Defective Product Claim: What You Need to Know

Posted By Law Office of James M. Stanley || 2-Feb-2021

We all expect the things we buy to be of quality and to work properly. There’s a reason that so many retail websites have a review feature. When you’ve spent good money on something that is a piece of junk, you get angry, and you want to tell others.

Bad products, however, can be more than just frustrating. They can be dangerous. If they weren’t properly tested or if they were poorly built, they can cause harm. If using a product, especially a new product that should have been rigorously quality checked, causes injury, it may be possible to sue the manufacturer.

Defective Product Lawsuits

In the state of Texas, consumers have 15 years to file a defective product lawsuit. If the product’s warranty extends beyond that time, it may be possible to sue later than that.

After the 15-year cutoff, it’s still possible to sue if your injury had a “delayed onset.” Delayed onset injuries happen over time, and you may not even be aware of them until much later. For example, a poorly designed keyboard may eventually lead to carpel tunnel syndrome, but you won’t start experiencing symptoms until later in life.

When suing for a product defect, you must prove to the court that the product caused harm. There are a few different ways to make this claim.

Design Flaw

When arguing that a product has design flaws, you are showing the court that the very architecture of the product is dangerous. In simpler terms, you are saying that even though the item was made perfectly – with no errors – its very shape, function, design, etc. poses a risk to users. (This argument will not apply to a device that is inherently dangerous, like power tools.)

To make this clearer, let’s look at a giant buzzsaw machine. It has big, spinning blades. If someone doesn’t follow safety precautions and gets hurt while using the machine, they can’t sue and claim that the product was defective. However, the machine could be designed poorly. Maybe certain parts of the machine are positioned in a way that forces the user to get closer to the blades when using it. That situation would make a much stronger case for design flaws.

Manufacturer Error

This happens when there is fault in how the product was made. Something was installed incorrectly, or there is a part that doesn’t work properly. You see this a lot with vehicle recalls. Just recently, there have been several electric cars catching fire due to a battery defect. No one anticipated this problem, and clearly the cars were not designed to burst into flame. This is an example of a defect on a manufacturer level. The product doesn’t work as intended, and if it caused an injury, the injured party can sue.

Improper Warning

Perhaps the creator of this product is completely aware of all its design flaws. It knows what parts of its product are inherently dangerous. In that case, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to provide sufficient warning.

Let’s go back to our giant buzzsaw. The consumer is completely aware of the dangers involved with spinning blades. What if the product overheats and burns the user? What if a flaw sometimes causes the blade to jut forward just a little, changing its position? Consumers have no way of knowing about these dangers without proper warning.

That’s the key to proving a failure to warn in court. The defect must be unexpected and unforeseeable. When such defects cause injuries, the makers need to be held accountable.

Jurisdiction Issues

It is crucial to seek the services of a good lawyer when filing a defective product claim. Jurisdiction of defective products gets messy. This part was made in Japan; but the device was assembled in the states; and none of it was manufactured in Texas. Furthermore, where the injury took place can affect who you can sue and how. You will need the help of an experienced lawyer when trying to decipher who can be held accountable and how.

If you have been injured from a product’s defects, we are here to help you get justice. For a free consultation, call us at (817) 591-4222 or contact us online.

Categories: Personal Injury, Product Liability

Share Post

Our Areas of Practice

  • Bicycle Accidents
  • Car Accidents
  • Catastrophic Injuries
  • Child Injuries
  • Construction Accidents
  • Electrocution
  • Fire & Explosions
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Pedestrian Accidents
  • Premises Liability
  • Product Liability
  • Trucking Accidents
  • Workplace Injuries
  • Wrongful Death

Start with a Free Case Consultation Today

The first step is easy. Tell us your story and we will give you a free evaluation.

Send My Information

The following is a sampling of some of the many cases we have had the privilege to handle on behalf of our clients. Each case is unique and must be evaluated on its own merits. Past results do not predict future results.​​

  • Catastrophic High Pressure Water Injury Resulting in Ruptured Colon, Infections, Multiple Surgeries Required

    NET TO CLIENT $3,069,546.66

  • Catastrophic Brain Injury/Motor Vehicle Accident

    NET TO CLIENT $3,018,051.78

  • Electrocution involving Defective Product

    NET TO CLIENT $2,491,510.87

  • Wrongful Death caused by Employer Negligence

    NET TO CLIENT $1,119,736.98

  • Grandmother seriously injured when rear-ended by 18-wheeler oil

    NET TO CLIENT $977,516.95

  • Wrongful Death due to Employer Negligence

    NET TO CLIENT $852,773.73

  • Wrongful Death caused by Employer Negligence.

    NET TO CLIENT $841,000.00

  • Catastrophic Injury caused by Defective Product.

    NET TO CLIENT $714,000.00

  • Wrongful Death caused by Employer Negligence

    NET TO CLIENT $728,664.19

  • Serious injury caused by 18-Wheeler blocking road

    NET TO CLIENT $584,309.41

  • Wrongful Death caused by Medical Malpractice.

    NET TO CLIENT $443,360.00

  • Wrongful Death and Survival Action

    NET TO CLIENT $461,423.23

  • Wrongful Death of a Fetus and Serious Personal Injury

    NET TO CLIENT $584,062.75

  • Wrongful Deaths

    NET TO CLIENT $532,211.06

  • Wrongful Death of a child

    NET TO CLIENT $499,266.40

  • Serious injuries to driver of 18-wheeler

    NET TO CLIENT $465,230.35

  • Wrongful Death caused by Medical Malpractice.

    NET TO CLIENT $359,520.00

  • Wrongful Death of a Child

    NET TO CLIENT $303,070.11

  • Wrongful Death of a Child

    NET TO CLIENT $380,345.57

  • Wrongful Death caused by physician negligence

    NET TO CLIENT$345,526.90

  • Serious Personal Injury

    NET TO CLIENT $352,813.23

  • Wrongful Death of a Child

    NET TO CLIENT $320,706.81

  • Medical negligence by hospital

    NET TO CLIENT $284,156.68

  • Wrongful Death Alcohol-Related Accident

    NET TO CLIENT $341,061.50


*The amounts reflected are the actual dollar amounts received by clients after deduction of attorney’s fees and expenses.
View More Results
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
Law Office of James M. Stanley

Call Today (817) 591-4222

Law Office of James M. Stanley -Fort Worth Personal Injury Lawyer
2200 Hemphill Street, Fort Worth, TX 76110 View Map
Call Today (817) 591-4222
Local (817) 335-7140
Website: https://www.law-jms.com/
© 2023 All Rights Reserved.

* James Stanley is the only attorney of the Law Office of James M. Stanley that has been inducted into the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum and Million Dollar Advocates Forum

Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.