Law Office of James M. Stanley
Call Us Today(817) 591-4222
Se Habla Español
  • Home
  • Attorneys
  • Firm Overview
  • Personal Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Blog
  • Case Results
  • Contact Us
  • Our office
  • In memory of Christi Stanley
  • Call Today
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu
  • We Take the Time To Understand Your Story

    Why Hire Us
  • We Tailor Our Solutions to Fit Your Needs

    Free Consultation
  • We Stand at Your Side from Start to Finish

    View Our Results
Blogs 2021 May Can a Trespasser Sue for Premises Liability?
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Can a Trespasser Sue for Premises Liability?

Posted By Law Office of James M. Stanley || 6-May-2021

If someone enters a property without permission, can they file a lawsuit if they are hurt? The answer, surprisingly, is yes.

Trespassers

A trespasser is someone who enters a property illegally. Even though they have no right to be there, they still have a reasonable expectation of safety. In theory, a trespasser who accidentally hurt themselves on an exposed hazard could sue the owner for negligence. Though possible, this scenario is unlikely and uncommon.

Trespassers cannot be intentionally harmed by unseen traps. Legally, trespassers are protected from hazards left on a property. Landowners have every right to set up defenses against invaders, but they must provide clear warnings of these defenses. For example, a landowner with bear traps in the yard needs a “Caution Beartraps” or similar signage. Without these warnings, the owner could be held liable for the trespasser’s injuries.

Attractive Nuisance

Another way trespassers could sue for their injuries is through the “attractive nuisance” doctrine. This legal precedent is designed to protect children. Landowners must be aware of what is exposed on their property and what may attract children. For example, young kids can see an empty refrigerator and want to play inside.

The philosophy behind this law is that young children don’t have the capacity to recognize the dangers of certain items. They may see something and be drawn to it, not considering the potential consequences of their actions. Argued well, attractive nuisance can be used for older kids or even teens. A reasonable case could be made that even though the older kids know they shouldn’t be on the property, the dangerous item was too alluring to ignore.

There are no hard-and-fast rules for what is or isn’t an attractive nuisance. The courts will determine what is a commonsense attraction. Essentially, property owners need to look over their land and ask, “Is there anything here that a kid may want to play with?” They should think like a child. If they have a swimming pool, abandoned car, construction machines, a trampoline, etc., they could have an attractive nuisance.

If an attractive nuisance is present, the owner needs to remove that item or bar it from the public. They should install fences or barriers. The best defense against an attractive nuisance is a high fence or a wooden one where outsiders cannot see what’s in the yard. Fencing and barriers need to be secure. If there is a hole in the fence, or if it can be easily surmounted, the property owner could still be held liable when a child is hurt on their property.

If you’ve been hurt on someone else’s property, reach out to our office. It is possible to review your case and determine that the owner’s negligence resulted in your injuries. You can call us at (817) 591-4222 or contact us online.

Categories: Personal Injury, Premises Liability

Share Post

Our Areas of Practice

  • Bicycle Accidents
  • Car Accidents
  • Catastrophic Injuries
  • Child Injuries
  • Construction Accidents
  • Electrocution
  • Fire & Explosions
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Pedestrian Accidents
  • Premises Liability
  • Product Liability
  • Trucking Accidents
  • Workplace Injuries
  • Wrongful Death

Start with a Free Case Consultation Today

The first step is easy. Tell us your story and we will give you a free evaluation.

Send My Information

The following is a sampling of some of the many cases we have had the privilege to handle on behalf of our clients. Each case is unique and must be evaluated on its own merits. Past results do not predict future results.​​

  • Catastrophic High Pressure Water Injury Resulting in Ruptured Colon, Infections, Multiple Surgeries Required

    NET TO CLIENT $3,069,546.66

  • Catastrophic Brain Injury/Motor Vehicle Accident

    NET TO CLIENT $3,018,051.78

  • Electrocution involving Defective Product

    NET TO CLIENT $2,491,510.87

  • Wrongful Death caused by Employer Negligence

    NET TO CLIENT $1,119,736.98

  • Grandmother seriously injured when rear-ended by 18-wheeler oil

    NET TO CLIENT $977,516.95

  • Wrongful Death due to Employer Negligence

    NET TO CLIENT $852,773.73

  • Wrongful Death caused by Employer Negligence.

    NET TO CLIENT $841,000.00

  • Catastrophic Injury caused by Defective Product.

    NET TO CLIENT $714,000.00

  • Wrongful Death caused by Employer Negligence

    NET TO CLIENT $728,664.19

  • Serious injury caused by 18-Wheeler blocking road

    NET TO CLIENT $584,309.41

  • Wrongful Death caused by Medical Malpractice.

    NET TO CLIENT $443,360.00

  • Wrongful Death and Survival Action

    NET TO CLIENT $461,423.23

  • Wrongful Death of a Fetus and Serious Personal Injury

    NET TO CLIENT $584,062.75

  • Wrongful Deaths

    NET TO CLIENT $532,211.06

  • Wrongful Death of a child

    NET TO CLIENT $499,266.40

  • Serious injuries to driver of 18-wheeler

    NET TO CLIENT $465,230.35

  • Wrongful Death caused by Medical Malpractice.

    NET TO CLIENT $359,520.00

  • Wrongful Death of a Child

    NET TO CLIENT $303,070.11

  • Wrongful Death of a Child

    NET TO CLIENT $380,345.57

  • Wrongful Death caused by physician negligence

    NET TO CLIENT$345,526.90

  • Serious Personal Injury

    NET TO CLIENT $352,813.23

  • Wrongful Death of a Child

    NET TO CLIENT $320,706.81

  • Medical negligence by hospital

    NET TO CLIENT $284,156.68

  • Wrongful Death Alcohol-Related Accident

    NET TO CLIENT $341,061.50


*The amounts reflected are the actual dollar amounts received by clients after deduction of attorney’s fees and expenses.
View More Results
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Site Map
  • Contact Us
Law Office of James M. Stanley

Call Today (817) 591-4222

Law Office of James M. Stanley -Fort Worth Personal Injury Lawyer
2200 Hemphill Street, Fort Worth, TX 76110 View Map
Call Today (817) 591-4222
Local (817) 335-7140
Website: https://www.law-jms.com/
© 2023 All Rights Reserved.

* James Stanley is the only attorney of the Law Office of James M. Stanley that has been inducted into the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum and Million Dollar Advocates Forum

Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.